Tuesday, July 1, 2008

consumption, consumption, what's your function?


It would be obvious to state that types, methods, and amounts of consumption have changed drastically within the past 200 years. Many widely owned commodities such as cars, phones, televisions, calculators, even contact lenses* were only marketed during the twentieth century. Yet, the actually necessity of many items we “need” is questionable; certainly our predecessors managed to survive without many of the technological, medical and commercial aids of our time (including tube yogurt and TiVo). Why, then, are current markets flooded with thousands of “necessary” items? Simply stated, our modes of consumption have shifted from satisfying our needs for survival to satisfying our needs to be happy.

Perhaps this shift became most prevalent when consumption became increasingly intertwined with consumerism, that is, the “doctrine validating abundance and prosperity” (B., G., & M., 58). This idea of consumerism promotes the message that material consumption is positively associated with wealth, thus, spending more shows (or gives the impression) that one has more to spend. Material consumption may also serve to exhibit the values of the consumer. Associations and organizations have been created to uphold the interests of consumers to ensure that they remain content and "informed" regarding their opportunities for consumption. Consumption in this sense, and especially in capitalist nations such as the United States, is viewed more as a right than a privilege and continues to validate purchases in the minds of consumers.

Although there are positive connotations to the "right to consume," some believe that consumption may be a right we abuse; the negative side of consumerism sees consumption as indulgent of "self-interests and vulgar materialism" (B., G., & M., 58). Not only is consumption synonymous for "decay," "devouring," "depletion," and "destruction," but it is the culprit in a slew of newly recognized mental and social illnesses. Consumer goods, food, alcohol, and sex are among the over-consumed entities found hard to resist; interestingly, they are also four things usually associated with feelings of pleasure or happiness. As our basic needs for food, shelter, and company are now easily met, it makes sense that we would begin to search for new needs in order to continue to better our lives. And it is a basic human instinct to seek out things that make us happy or comfortable to the greatest possible extent. Unfortunately, in this era of consumption, it can be difficult for a person to realize when their needs have been fulfilled; instead, we keep buying and consuming goods we think we need in the search for total satisfaction.

Thank goodness SoBe will begin bottling willpower soon.

*Fun Fact: Leonardo da Vinci, among his many achievements, is also credited as being the original inventor of the contact lens.

4 comments:

Danielle Young said...

Your fun fact was interesting and something that I never knew or would have guessed. Your post proves your point very well and has great flow throughout. I like how you have connected the idea of need that we have today with just being happy, and I think it is an excellent point. I do feel that consumerism has come to what makes us happy is what we need which may not be our essential survival needs. You bring up a fascinating view on what "need" means to us today and you prove it with elegance.

Colleen said...

I LOVE the Sobe comment at the end, it brings humor into what could have been a very serious (and even dire) conversation about the problems with consumerism. Your post also tied in with today's discussion of happiness, which seems to be developing into a very problematic idea.

Should we be striving only for happiness? The questions your post spark remind me of the book, The Great Gatsby. While we strive for what we think makes us happy, we seem to be miserable, and then when we finally attain our goals, we find them to be empty and meaningless.
But at least you left us with Sobe ;)

Christopher Schaberg said...

I guess I'm a little unclear about what your actual argument is. You shift 'needs' to "needs to be happy"—but you seem to suggest through your links that happiness has more to do with therapy and healing than anything else. I'm not sure that we know what the word 'happy' even means. Maybe this is the point of your post: that we don't know how to talk about 'happiness' because all these consumer objects and bottled liquids (and even "fun facts"!) get in the way. Have you seen the film "Happiness"? It would add some sharp dimensions to your post. Fascinatingly, the "word verification" beneath this comment screen reads: "skiavntv"—as if trying to remind me that skiing is happiness, audio/visual things are happiness, 'n' TV is happiness!! Weird.

Rachel said...

Hmm... I think I see your point. I may try to rewrite it for one of my next posts. I thought I had tied it together towards the end of the third paragraph, but maybe it wasn't a concise enough argument.